Two petitions have been filed in the Delhi and Mumbai high courts against a provision in the GST regime. The provision allows levying both the basic Customs duty and IGST on cost, insurance, and freight (CIF) value of goods brought into India, and also an IGST on ocean freight between two foreign parties for movement of these goods. While the Delhi High Court has admitted the petition of Narendra Plastic, a similar petition was filed by Victory Ventures in the Bombay High Court.

Suppose, some goods come from Washington to London first before being shipped further to Mumbai port. There is an element of ocean freight between parties in Washington and London. This cost could include steamship costs, broker commissions, duties and tariffs, vessel and port maintenance costs, labour costs, etc.

Now, the argument of the parties, that have gone to courts, is that, when the basic Customs duty and IGST is already paid on CIF value, why should there be another tax on ocean freight element? Since this will only give rise to the double taxation, as the ocean freight element is already being included in CIF itself.  Besides, how are Indian parties be concerned with transaction done between two oveseas parties.

Sources : Various News Agencies

© 2019 Andees Consultant. All Rights Reserved.

error: Content is protected !!